Header Ads

Reason why Fans are Convinced Kylie Jenner Secretly Parted with Travis Scott

Reason why Fans are Convinced Kylie Jenner Secretly Parted with Travis Scott

Reason why Fans are Convinced Kylie Jenner Secretly Parted with Travis Scott
Reason why Fans are Convinced Kylie Jenner Secretly Parted with Travis Scott
(Credit: Instagram)

Fans are persuaded Kylie Jenner has covertly parted from her long term sweetheart Travis Scott.

Related: Kylie Jenner flaunts her natural makeup-free freckled skin selfie with daughter Stormi, 4: Photo

The rapper was discernibly missing from Kylie's virtual entertainment content over Christmas, and was no place to be seen on her New Year's excursion to Aspen. This has persuade fans to think the couple might have unobtrusively chosen to head out in different directions.

The 25-year-old celebrated the New Year with her sister Kendall Jenner and a gathering of companions in Colorado over the course of the end of the week, while Travis was seen in Miami. He likewise didn't show up in any photographs that were shared from the Kardashian-Jenner family's yearly Christmas Eve party.

Kylie went to the slam with their four-year-old girl Stormi, however Travis wasn't seen at the occasion. Fans have since run to Reddit to address whether Kylie and Travis have separated. Subsequent to sharing a TikTok video of Kylie observing NYE with her companion Stassie Karanikolaou, one client inquired: "Where Could Travis have been?"

Related: Kylie Jenner Kills Cross section Bodysuit and Fur Coat In Aspen With Stormi, 4, Kendall, And The Biebers: Photo

Someone else remarked: "He wasn't there since they clearly aren't together. In the event that they were I can't see an existence where they'd spend new years separated." A third expressed: "I think they [have] chilled off once more." In a different string, fans brought up that Kylie has been more dynamic via virtual entertainment as of late - and guaranteed she typically possibly does this when she's single.

Kylie and Travis have been together here and there beginning around 2017, subsequent to meeting at Coachella. The couple share two kids - a four-year-old little girl named Stormi, and an eight-month-old child, whose name is yet to be unveiled. Bits of gossip about their split come only months after Travis had to deny claims he went behind Kylie's back with a supposed previous fire.

Related: Kylie Jenner Goes Makeup-Free and Embraces mother Kris In Matching PJs Post Christmas: Photo

The rapper made an announcement after Instagram model Rojean Kar posted a photograph of him on set on her Instagram Story. She inscribed the snap: "I'm coordinating obvi ." Rojean was first connected to Travis back in 2013, yet the rapper has since denied they at any point dated. He composed on his Instagram Stories: "It's a great deal of peculiar ** going on. An excluded individual was sneaking photographs on what should be a shut set while I was coordinating a video."

"I'm expressing this once and for all. I don't have a clue about this individual. I've never been with this individual. So kindly stop with the ceaseless digital games and fictitious narrating." Rojean then reshared Travis' post to her Instagram Stories, and blamed him for "lying" about not knowing her.

Related: Travis Scott's rumored 'mistress' blames Kylie Jenner for replicating her and acting 'humiliating' prior to erasing the post

The model, who has 222k devotees on Instagram, professed to have photographs and recordings of her and Travis together - and, surprisingly, asserted they went through Valentine's Day together. Accordingly, Travis took to Instagram to share "evidence" that he was not with Rojean on Valentine's Day.

The 31-year-old, whose genuine name is Jacques Bermon Webster II, posted a photograph of a kitchen table that was taken at 8:09pm on February 14. He composed close by the snap: "In the event that u wasn't at this table on V day then u wasn't with me." Rojean then divided a screen capture of a text discussion among her and a companion, in which she expressed: "Perhaps it was the fifteenth."

The companion then answered with a photograph likewise taken on the fourteenth, and stated: "No you're correct. This was the 14. Ur not insane."

No comments

Powered by Blogger.