Blac Chyna Alleges That The Kardashians Lawyer was 'Undeniably Hostile and Extremely Biased' In Defamation Case

 Blac Chyna Alleges That The Kardashians Lawyer was 'Undeniably Hostile and Extremely Biased' In Defamation Case

(Source: Instagram)
 

New court archives show Blac Chyna has documented to pursue the decision in her criticism body of evidence against the Kardashians - - and the family is retaliating.

Related: Blac Chyna's Lawyer Reveals She Vows to 'Appeal' Again After Losing Lawsuit Against Kardashians

Blac Chyna is fighting back against the adjudicator who administered her maligning body of evidence against the KarJenner family. As per court records got by HollywoodLife, Chyna, conceived Angela White, documented a preemptory challenge against Judge Gregory W. Alarcon of the Los Angeles Superior Court on Monday, asserting he was "undeniably hostile and extremely biased" in his decision against her and her lawyer, Lynne Ciani, during the case.

Per the archives, the 33-year-old additionally trusts Alarcon's supposed inclination impacted various parts of the case, including "the jury making ‘key liability verdicts in her favor'" as well as her being "denied due process with regard to the jury instructions and special verdict form."

Related: Blac Chyna's Adjudicator Denied an Opportunity for Redo Testimony Against The Kardashians

Accordingly, the KarJenner tribe is as of now retaliating. Their lawyer, Michael G. Rhodes, documented a 20-page resistance on Monday, May 9, contending that Chyna and her lawyer "nonetheless proceeded without complaint as Judge Alarcon presided over a 10-day trial" in spite of the alleged propose issues with him.

"In the days and weeks that followed, [Chyna] and her counsel had ample time to raise her completely misguided allegations about Judge Alarcon’s impartiality, along with numerous opportunities to brief evidentiary issues, jury instructions, and the special verdict form," the report states.

Related: Kim Kardashian 'Freed' From Blac Chyna's Defamation Lawsuit Trial Against Her and Her Family

"Indeed, Judge Alarcon explicitly invited Ms. Ciani to brief issues relating to jury instructions and evidentiary issues, such as sustained objections for hearsay and lack of authenticity, which she never did,” the record proceeds. "Instead, Ms. Ciani first raised several of the [issues discussed in her statement of disqualification] in a written filing after the jury had begun deliberating."

The record goes on, "Judge Alarcon demonstrated considerable tolerance towards Ms. Ciani despite her failure to understand and apply basic rules of evidence." Additionally, the record expresses that Ciani is attempting to "salvage" her standing by "deflecting blame for her own shortcomings at trial and generate further publicity for Plaintiff."

Related: Rob Kardashian is 'Thrilled' As The Kardashians Won Blac Chyna Lawsuit Trial: 'He's Just Glad' It's Over

"Plaintiff’s request for disqualification should be denied for at least two reasons," the record states. "First, Plaintiff has waived her request for disqualification by failing to seek such recourse during trial, when the purported facts constituting the grounds for disqualification allegedly occurred. Second, even if the Court entertained Plaintiff’s late request, Plaintiff’s unsubstantiated  suggestions of bias on the part of Judge Alarcon come nowhere close to meeting the high burden required for his disqualification."

The first claim guaranteed that the Kardashians had slandered Chyna and disrupted E! to get her show, Rob and Chyna, dropped. After the decision was reached, The Kardashians' legal counselor expressed gratitude toward the jury. "We are also grateful for the steady hand of Judge Alarcon in making sure that this was a fair trial. The jury sent a clear message to Ms. White and her lawyer — I hope they are listening. Justice has prevailed," he said in an articulation, got by HL.